The hardest part of doing something is getting started. From my experience, this is because of mental resistance and unfair expectations. I often believe I shouldn’t do something unless it’ll be perfect. My mentality on this count is flawed for two reasons.

The first way that this thinking fails is that it would exclude good or even great work. Ignoring quality, but imperfect work would be detrimental to society as a whole.
I personally enjoy and find value in Newtonian Mechanics. If I were to only accept perfect works, I would have to ignore this useful framework. Although it fails at the extremes, for a majority of uses traditional mechanics is perfectly fine.
Similarly, we wouldn’t be able to listen to most of the songs we enjoy, observe most of the art we love, or partake in most of the work we do daily. Perfection is impossible. Without allowing imperfect work, most of what we produce, we’d dramatically reduce our quality of life.

The second way is because it prevents you from starting. Mastery is only obtained through repeatedly working on your craft. Without the constant reiteration, you never gain the necessary experience of mending your mistakes.
My beliefs about mastery come from Cal Newport. In his book So Good They Can’t Ignore You he discusses an experiment. Students in an art class are given two choices, either be graded on 1 pot or the combined weight of all.
Many people would expect the first group to produce a higher quality product. Paradoxically, this isn’t the case. Instead, the group focused on quantity generally produced higher quality ones.
This is because the second group had more experience overall. The experience led to better designs and fewer critical errors. More time in the arena, without caring about quality, allowed for better quality to emerge.

So, where does “two crappy pages” come from? More importantly, how is it related to my tangent?
When I was looking up advice for aspiring writers, this frequently popped up. Steven King said this for two reasons.
The first reason concerns professionalism. One definition of a professional is someone who shows up long after a task is easy or fun. Producing crap writing isn’t fun. However, all writers know that you get paid by a final product, and the only way to get a final product is to have a draft.
If one embodies this definition of professionalism, they are likely to see more success in any field and vocation.
The second reason relates to momentum. If you’ve heard of a Pomodoro session, this is a writers equivalent. 500 crapy words encourage you to start because the bar to entry is so low. Often after this goal is achieved, you’ll want to continue writing.
Even if you don’t continue writing after “two crappy pages,” you still made forward progress and can safely disengage. This technique ultimately becomes a win-win. As long as you follow through, some good emerges regardless of your choice after.

Oh, I have one last confession. I used this ideology to write this article. My mind currently wants to do nothing productive, but I need to write something. I don’t need to write a masterpiece.
Allowing myself to write a “crappy two-page” post took all the pressure away and made the task more enjoyable. It may have taken me an hour to produce this article, but that’s okay.
I still accomplished my goal and added another pot to my collection. Eventually, I’ll be able to make these kinds of articles faster and of higher quality because of the reps I’m putting in now.





